لومڑی دی چالاکی تے خرگوش
کسے جنگل وچ خرگوشاں دی اک جوڑی رہندی سی۔ بہت سوہنے اک خرگوش تے اک خرگوشنی ہسدے کھیڈدے اوہناں دے دن بہت پیار نال گزر رہے سن۔ دونویں اک دوسرے دا بہت خیال رکھدے سن۔ اک دوسرے دی گل مندے۔ اوہناں وچکار کدے وی کسے گل تے جھگڑا نئیں سی ہویا۔ دونویں مل کے شکار کردے تے مل کے کھاندے سن۔
اک دن اچانک جدوں اوہ گھر دے باہر کھیڈ رہے سن کہ اک بھیڑیا آ گیا۔ اوہنے جدوں موٹے تازے خرگوش ویکھے تاں اوس دی نیت وچ فتور آ گیا۔ اوس خرگوش اتے حملہ کیتا۔ خرگوشنی تے خرگوش رل کے جرأت نال اوس دا مقابلہ کیتا تے بھیڑئیے نوں اوتھوں نسن تے مجبور کر دتا۔ بھیڑیے نوں شکار ہتھ نہ لگن تے ہار اتے بہت غصہ آیا۔ اوہ اوتھوں چلا تے گیا پر جاندے ہوئے آکھن لگا میں تہانوں چھڈاں گا نئیں۔
اک دن اوس چالاک لومڑی نوں اپنے گھر دعوت تے بلایا تے دعوت توں بعد اوس نوں آکھیا کہ توں میرا اک کم کر میں تینوں انعام دیواں گا۔ انعام دے لالچ وچ آ کے اوس کم کرن دی حامی بھر لئی۔ بھیڑیا آکھدا اے کہ جنگل کے اوس نکرے اک موٹا تازہ خرگوش تے خرگوشنی رہندے نیں۔ اوہناں دا آپس وچ بہت پیار اے۔ توں اوہناں وچکار غلط فہمی پیدا کر۔ جدوں اوہ بدظن ہو جاون گے تاں میں وار و واری اوہناں دا شکار کراں گا۔ا نعام دے نال نال اوہناں دا تازہ گوشت وی تینوں دیواں گا۔
اگلے دن خرگوش بیمار ہو جاندا اے تے خرگوشنی اکلے ای شکار کرن لئی آ رہی ہوندی اے۔ لومڑی نے موقع دا فائدہ چک دے ہویاں پہلاں خرگوش تے خرگوشنی دا حال پچھیا جدوں اوس نوں پتہ...
The twentieth century is considered as the most notable era for interfaith dialogue and other interreligious activities among the followers of different faiths across the globe. A number of interfaith activities were launched to bring closer, especially, the adherents of the Abrahamic faiths: Jews, Christians and Muslims. Many Christian institutes and organizations are actively involved in such activities. We cannot ignore the role of Christian Study Centers situated across the globe, which are rendering considerable services in the field of interfaith dialogue. One of them is the Christian Study Center Rawalpindi (CSC), Pakistan, which is the focal subject of this research paper. The CSC has a long journey in the course of interfaith dialogue and harmony, as it was its objective since its commencement. The CSC was established in 1967 as an extension of HMI (Henry Martyn Institute, Hyderabad India) to promote interfaith dialogue, harmony and good relationship among the followers of different faiths in Pakistan. It is conceded; the Christian Study Center Rawalpindi has provided great services and contributed a lot to interfaith dialogue, harmony and peace in Pakistan. In this study the efforts were made to evaluate the 50 years dialogical activities of the Christian Study Center (CSC), Rawalpindi.
Background: The medical management of chronic anal fissure varies among clinicians because no single treatment has yet approached an overall healing rate similar to lateral sphincterotomy. However, chemical sphincterotomy has the advantage of not carrying the presumed high risk of faecal incontinence. Glyceryl Trinitrate is commonly used in our practice with varied response. This study set out to evaluate the effectiveness of a locally compounded preparation of 0.2% topical Nifedipine in the treatment of chronic anal fissure and to compare the investigational product to 0.2% Glyceryl Trinitrate in overall healing rate and relieving pain. Design: Single centre, parallel, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: The surgical outpatient department at Aga Khan University Hospital (Nairobi). Participants: Patients with chronic anal fissure were recruited from the surgical outpatient department. Intervention: A computer generated randomization sequence was used to allocate treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to receive Glyceryl Trinitrate or Nifedipine, both applied 12 hourly topically to the perianal region for a period of eight weeks. Main Outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was overall healing rate of chronic anal fissure after eight weeks of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were cumulative healing rate, time to resolution of pain and occurrence of headache. Results: There was no significant difference recorded between the test and control drugs with regard to age, gender, duration of symptoms, fissure position or entry VAS pain score. Seventy five patients (Glyceryl Trinitrate n=38; Nifedipine n=37) were randomized. The mean age was 36.3 years (SD 11.9) with a mean duration of symptoms of 37.4 weeks (SD 36). Males comprised 48.6 percent of the patients. Seven patients were excluded from analysis because of loss to follow up or missing data, leaving 68 (n=33; n=35) patients for intention to treat analysis. Healing rate was higher (p=0.001) with Nifedipine (94.3 percent) as compared with Glyceryl Trinitrate (60.6 percent). The mean time to healing was shorter (p<0.001) in patients treated with Nifedipine (6.5 ± 1.2 weeks) compared with Glyceryl Trinitrate (9.1 ± 1.9 weeks). The mean pain scores after two and four weeks of treatment differed (p<0.001) with quicker resolution in the Nifedipine group. On completion of treatment at eight weeks, pain scores were significantly lower in both groups (0.25 in Glyceryl Trinitrate and 0 in Nifedipine versus 7.0 and 7.8, respectively). Headaches were more frequent (p<0.001) with Glyceryl Trinitrate (69.7 percent) as compared with Nifedipine. Conclusion: Topical application of 0.2% Nifedipine was more effective than