مولوی ابراہیم میرؒ سیالکوٹی کی ادبی خدمات
مولوی ابراہیم میر سیالکوٹی ؒ (۱۸۷۴ء ،۱۹۵۶ء) سیالکوٹ میں پیدا ہوئے۔آپؒ سکاچ مشن ہائی سکول گندم منڈی سیالکوٹ میں علامہ محمد اقبال کے ہم جماعت تھے۔(1) سکول کی تعلیم کے دوران ہی انھوں نے سیالکوٹ کے ایک متقی و متجرعالم مولانا ابو عبداللہ المعروف غلام حسن(یہ عالم دین علامہ اقبال کے ابتدائی اُستاد تھے) کے سامنے زانوئے شاگردی تہہ کیا۔(2)مرے کالج سیالکوٹ میںآپ کو مولوی میر حسن کی شاگردی بھی میسرآئی۔ آپ نے عربی کے ساتھ ساتھ فارسی زبان میں بھی مہارت حاصل کر لی، سکول کی طرح کالج میں بھی آپ کو علامہ اقبال کی ہم نشینی و صحبت حاصل رہی۔(3)
مولوی ابراہیم سیالکوٹی انتہائی ذہین و فطین اور قوی حافظہ کے مالک تھے۔ انھوں نے صرف ایک ماہ کے قلیل عرصہ میں پورا قرآن پاک حفظ کیا۔(4)مولانا موصوف نے اپنی تعلیم کا آغاز دنیاوی تعلیم سے کیا لیکن دینی تعلیم کے حصول کے لیےبیسویں صدی کے عالم باعمل مولاناعبدالمنان وزیر آبادیؒ کے حلقہ درس میں داخل ہو گئے۔(5)جہاں تفسیر،حدیث اور دیگر علوم دینیہ اور عربی زبان پر مہارت تامہ حاصل کی۔ بعد ازاں سید نذیر حسین محدث دہلویؒ کے حلقہ درس میں شامل ہوکر مسندو اجازۂ حدیث سے منفتحر ہوئے۔6))
مولاناسیالکوٹی نہ صرف نامور مشاہیر کے شاگرد تھے۔ بلکہ ان کےمراسمعظیمشاعر فیض احمد فیضؔ کے والد محترم سلطان محمد خان کے ساتھ بھی تھے ۔یہی وجہ ہے کہ فیض احمد فیض نے قرآن مجید کے ابتدائی پارے مولانا موصوفؒ کے مدرسے میں حفظ کیے اوراسکاچ مشن ہائی سکول میںان سے علوم مشرقی کی باقاعدہ تعلیم حاصل کی۔7))
مولوی ابراہیم میر سیالکوٹی عالم باعمل ہونے کے ساتھ ساتھ مذہبی و دینی نثر نگار تھے۔ ان کی اُردو نثری کتابیں تفسیرِ قرآن مجید ،سیرت النبیؐ،مناظروں اور تقابل ادیان پر مشتمل ہیں۔ مولوی موصوف عربی ،فارسی اور اردو زبان پر دسترس...
Mankind among the other creatures is a superior creation of Allah. Though he has been gifted and empowered with strength and logic, yet at times he becomes vulnerable or unfortified during his life span. To handle and manage such weak events and moments of life, Allah has laid down a law of necessity upon him. Since Islam is the religion of ease, comfort and compassion in all matters, therefore on the one hand it provides the regular course of system for the usual and routine matters, while on the other hand it promulgates the law of necessity for unusual and extra ordinary matters. The Western legal system also recognizes such concept of law, but as compared to Islamic concept of law of necessity it does not cover all the aspects of human vulnerability. This paper puts forth a discourse that how this exceptional segment of law can be applied and what is the difference between the Islamic concept of law of necessity and that of which the western legal system has.
Crop-weed competition and interactions are the focus of many researchers to make weed management decision accurate and economical. Therefore pot and field studies were conducted in two consecutive years (2012-13 and 2013-14) at two different locations viz Peshawar (34.0167° N, 71.5833° E) and Chitral (35° 50'' 46 N, 71° 47'' 9 E) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province, Pakistan. The aims of the experiments were to determine the competitive ability of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) with wheat (Triticum aestivum L) at two ecologically different locations and the possible effects on quantity and quality of wheat grains. In field studies, the experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (additive design) with three replications in which the seed rate of wheat (var. Ata-Habib) was 125 kg ha-1 while wild oat was sown at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 plants m-2. All other weeds were removed manually. Field data showed that number of spikes m-2, number of grains spike-1, and biological yield of wheat during year 1 and plant height and spike length of wheat during year 2 were significantly higher at Peshawar when compared with Chitral. However, the grain yield of wheat was statistically similar at both the locations. The effects of different wild oat densities during both the years were prominent by significantly decreasing the grain and biological yield related variables of wheat. During both the years, the number of tillers and spikes in wild oat-free plots were significantly higher than wild oat infested plots; depending on density. Wild oat density above 5 m-2 resulted in decreasing the wheat yield components. These results showed that wild oat start competition at initial stage of the wheat. All other yield related variables of wheat were decreased with the increasing density of wild oat, indicated that wild oat compete with wheat throughout the crop season. The grain yield losses in wheat ranged from 2-35% during year 1 and 1-21% during year 2 at wild oat density of 5-40 plants m-2. The interaction of location and treatments on biological and grain yield was significant; showing that certain environmental factors favoured the wheat. Like wheat, wild oat biomass and plant height was also higher at Peshawar as compared to Chitral. The quality variables of wheat grains showed that protein content in wheat grains was decreased at higher densities of wild oat. During year 2, the gluten content in Chitral was decreased with increase in density of wild oat. The replacement series experiment showed that the relative yield total (RYT) was vi close to 1; indicating that both species are equally competitive although wheat was relatively dominant species (under field conditions) in mixtures. The same experiments (additive and replacement series) were conducted in pots. The density of wheat was kept constant (10 plants pot-1) while the densities of A. fatua were 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 plants pot-1. Biomass of wheat and wild oat (pot-1) were recorded. While in replacement series experiment, the same protocol was used except, that there were eleven treatments and the total density of crop and weed (wheat and wild oat) in each pot was constant, but species grown together were varied from 0 to 100%. Plants established in a mixture with proportions of 10:00, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8, 1:9 and 0:10 (wheat : wild oat) plants pot-1. Pot experiments showed that wheat biomass was similar during both years while wild oat biomass was significantly higher. Wheat and wild oat biomass was decreased (R2 value of 96 %) for wheat and wild oat (R2 value of 94 %) in quadratic fashion. Relative yield total (RYT) showed that both the species are competitive where wheat was dominant in term of biomass production under the mentioned cultural practices. The regression equation demonstrated a good fit to the data with R2 values of 89% in year 1 as compared 96% during year 2. However, wild oat gave higher RYT in pots as compared to field conditions. In light of the present studies, it is concluded that presence of wild oat decreased all yield and biological yield related variables of wheat. Because early stage and later stage related variables of wheat were decreased, suggested that wild oat competes with wheat throughout the crop season. Apart from these, the quality variables of wheat; especially protein content is decreased due to presence of wild oat at higher density. Hence management of wild oat at any location needs to be implemented to get higher yield of wheat grains with good protein content. Due to morphological similarity of wild oat with wheat, this weed proved strong competitor. Therefore, it is suggested that wild oat needs to be controlled in wheat even at density of less than 5 plants m-2.