سیٹھ ابراہیم مہتمم مدرسہ عمر آباد
عمرآباد مدراس میں حاجی عمر (روشن کمپنی) کا خاندان ایک خاص حیثیت رکھتا ہے۔ حاجی صاحب امرتسر کے علمائے غزنویہ کے فیض سے مستفیض اور توحید و سنت کے متبع تھے، کامیاب تاجر تھے، اپنے ہی نام سے شمالی آرکاٹ میں ایک زمین خرید کر عمرآباد نام کا ایک مقام آباد کیا تھا اور وہاں ایک بڑے عربی مدرسہ دارالسلام کی بنیاد رکھی تھی، چندسال ہوئے کہ انہوں نے وفات پائی اور تیں صالح اولادیں اپنی یادگار چھوڑیں، اسماعیل، ابراہیم اور اسحاق، سب سے بڑے اسماعیل تو کاروبار کے نگراں ہیں اور ابراہیم نے جو منجھلے تھے مدرسہ کی دیکھ بھال، اس کے قیام و ترقی کو اپنی زندگی کا مقصد قرار دیا تھا، ابھی پچھلے سال جوہری طنطاوی کی تفسیر کا اردو ترجمہ ایک ہزار روپے کے صرف سے مطبع معارف میں چھپوایا تھا، مدرسہ کے لئے کتب خانہ تنہا اپنی ذات سے کتابیں خرید کر فراہم کیا تھا، اس کے لئے ایک عمارت بھی بنوائی تھی، افسوس کہ یہ پھول کھلنے سے پہلے ہی مرجھا گیا، یعنی ۳۰؍ رجب ۱۳۵۷ھ کو اس دنیائے ناپائیدار کو الوداع کہا، رحمہ اﷲ تعالیٰ۔ (سید سلیمان ندوی، نومبر ۱۹۳۸ء)
‘Abdullah bin al-Mubark was born in Marw’ one of the prime cities in Khurasan, (nowadays in the surroundings of Afghanistan and Central Asia), in the year 118 AH. In addition to his many talents, achievements and abilities, ‘Abdullah bin al-Mubarak was also gifted in literacy, particularly in the art of poetry. He held an eloquent tongue which was recognized by all who conversed with him and his language displayed the nature of someone who had been taught well. Most of the poetry which has been recorded from him is actually his advice to others, whether they were close friends or high-ranking Caliphs and Rulers. The topics spoken of concerned the common issues which had arisen in his time (e.g. Matters pertaining to theology, politics, the worldview, the community etc) and as always, they contained much wisdom and hence the books of history have sealed them and recorded them. This research article discussed Biography of Abdullah ibn Al Mubarak, The Islamic Ethics in his poetry, Impact of Rhetoric on his poetry with special concentration on the four kinds i.e. Citation, impact of Quranic words, Quranic pictorial and Quranic style on his poetry.
The present study aimed in finding out leadership style of school principals, and the relationship of leadership
style flexibility and effectiveness with collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. It also focused on
finding out the differences, if any, between leadership style flexibility and leadership style effectiveness of
male and female principals, and the differences between collective efficacies of teachers working under
principals with different leadership styles.
The difference in achievements of students studying under principals following different leadership styles
was also examined. In total 19 null hypotheses were formulated. The population comprised Army Public
Schools and Colleges located in all the eleven regions throughout Pakistan. The sample taken was a population
sample. Data regarding school principals’ leadership style, style flexibility and style effectiveness were
obtained through the instruments of Leader Behavior Analysis (LBA-II Self and LBA-II Other). Data regarding
collective teacher efficacy were obtained using Collective Efficacy Scale (CE-Scale) and the data on student
achievement grade were obtained through results of students who appeared in the SSC annual examination
conducted by Federal Board of Intermediate & Secondary Education, Islamabad (FBI&SE) in the year 2008.
Parametric statistical techniques including correlation, t-test and ANOVA were used to analyze the data.
The key conclusions based on the descriptive and inferential statistical evidences of the study indicated that
there was consistency between the perception of school principals and their teachers regarding the
leadership style, style flexibility and style effectiveness of school principals. Participating was perceived as
the primary leadership style of the majority of school principals; Selling was the secondary leadership style,
while Delegating was perceived as the developing style. The school principals’ leadership style flexibility and
effectiveness were inversely related with each other as well as with collective teacher efficacy.
It was concluded that school principals’ leadership style flexibility was inversely related student achievement.
However, principals’ leadership style effectiveness and student achievement were positively related. Collective
teacher efficacy and student achievement were positively related, thereby concluding that more collective
teacher efficacy may result in higher student achievement. No difference was noted between collective efficacy
of teachers working under principals with different leadership styles. There was no difference observed
between achievement scores of students who were studying under principals following different leadership
styles.