Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > فتاویٰ قاضی خان کےر ما بعد فتاویٰ جات پراثرات

فتاویٰ قاضی خان کےر ما بعد فتاویٰ جات پراثرات

Thesis Info

Author

محمد امین

Supervisor

سعید احمد سعیدی

Program

PhD

Institute

Lahore Garrison University

City

لاہور

Degree Starting Year

2016

Degree End Year

2019

Language

Urdu

Keywords

فقہی مسائل اور کتبِ فتاویٰ

Added

2023-02-16 17:15:59

Modified

2023-02-16 17:33:40

ARI ID

1676730969583

Similar


Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

شہزادے دے تن دوست

شہزادے دے تن دوست

پرانے وقتاں دی گل اے کہ کسے ملک اتے اک بادشاہ حکومت کردا سی۔ اوس دے تن پتر تے اک دھی سی۔ دو پتر اوس دے بڑے فرمانبردار سن۔ اپنے پیو دی ہر گل مندے تے پوری محنت نال اوہناںنوں جو کم دتا جاندا اوہ کردے سن۔ ایس وجہ کر کے بادشاہ دونواں پتر نوں بہت پیار کر دا سی۔ بادشاہ دا تیجا پتر انتہائی نکما تے کاہل سی۔ کسے کم وچ دھیان نہ لیندا۔ سارا دن شکار کھیڈ دا تے روٹی کھا کے سوں رہندا۔ بادشاہ نے ہر طرح کوشش کیتی کہ اوہ کم وچ دھیان دیوے۔ پر اوہدی ہر کوشش ناکام رہی۔ تنگ آ کے اوس نے اوہنوں محل وچوں کڈھ دتا۔

ہن اوہ مایوسی دے عالم وچ ان ڈٹھی منزل ول ٹرویندا اے۔ رستے وچ اوس نوں اوہدا اک سجن ملدا اے۔ اوس دے پچھن تے شہزادہ اوس نوں دسدا اے کہ اوہدے پیو نے اوہنوں گھروں کڈھ دتا اے۔ اوہ آکھدا اے کہ میں وی تیرے نال چلدا آں۔ شہزادے نے اوہنوں پچھیا کہ توں کیہ کرسکدا ایں؟ اوہنے جواب دتا کہ میں ادھ اسمان وچوں تیر دا نشانہ لاہ کے کوئی وی شے دھرتی اتے سٹ سکدا آں۔ شہزادہ اوہنوں اپنے نال جاون دی اجازت دے دیندا اے۔

جدوں اوہ دونویں اگانہہ ٹرے جاندے نیں تاں اوہناں نوں اک ہور بندہ ملدا اے۔ اوہدے پچھن تے شہزادہ دسدا اے کہ اوہدے پیو نے اوہنوں گھروں کڈھ دتا اے۔ ہن میں اپنے ایس دوست نال روزی دی تلاش وچ جا رہیا آں۔ ایس شخص اک لت توں معذور ہوندا اے۔ اوہ آکھدا اے کہ شہزادہ سلامت مینوں وی نال لے چلو۔ شہزادہ اوس کولوں پچھدا اے کہ توں کیہ کر سکدا ایں؟ اوہ آکھدا اے کہ میں ڈیڑھ منٹ وچ...

مولانا ابو الکلام آزاد‌ کا تفسیری اسلوب: سورة الکہف کا خصوصی مطالعہ

Since about the middle of the 19th century, numerous attempts have been made by Muslim  scholars to interpret the Qur’ān  to the modern world. By far the largest output of literature produced in this connection, whether in the form of commentaries, critiques or articles in periodical, has been in Urdu, English and Arabic. But whatever the medium of expression employed, the net result is still is far from satisfactory.               Moulana Abul Kalam Azad (1888-1958) was one of the most notable Muslim figures in Sub-continent. The Tarjuman-al-Qur’ān  is regarded on all hands as his main contribution to Islamic learning. His original plan was to prepare side by side two companion volumes to this great of his, one entitled Tafsir-al-Bayana affording a detailed commentary of the Qur’ān, the other entitled Muqaddima, to serve as prolegomena to the Tarjuman -al-Qur’ān. The circumstances of his life did not allow him the time that he needed to execute the two projects. Moulana Azad, s thinking and philosophy about commentary of the Qur’ān  is very clear: ''Explain the Qur’ān  in the manner of the Qur’ān ''.                This paper attempts to enlighten many aspects of Moulana Azad, s commentary of Surat-al-Kahaf and explores his contribution and Comparative Analysis for other selected Urdu Tafasir of his era.

An Exploratory Study of Grade 10 Students Perspectives on Making Learning of Biology Effective

This study aimed to explore Grade 10 students' perspectives concerning the biology topics that they find the most difficult to learn, the reasons of experiencing difficulties in learning biology, and ways to overcome the difficulties. The study employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches. A survey tool difficulties and effectiveness in Learning Biology questionnaire (DELBQ) was adapted from the literature which has already been used in other context in a similar study (Cimer, 2012). 132 Grade 10 students participated in the cross-sectional survey including girls (n=86; 65%) and boys (n=46; 35%). The sample was recruited from 10 public schools of district Hunza. DELBQ was directly administered to all participants. The results showed that students have identified five concepts of biology - genetic engineering (37%), cell division (31%), Mendel principles and application (28%), defense and immunity (23%) and matter cycle (17%) - as the most difficult concepts to learn. The students proposed multiple reasons to learning hindrances which include: the nature of the topic, teachers' teaching method, students' learning techniques, students' attitudes towards the topics and deficiency of resources and time. Prominently, of five the themes 'the nature of the topic' was found to be the most repeatedly cited reason (99) for difficulty in learning biology. Students have not only identified these hindering factors of learning they have talked about viable suggestions to improve learning of the subject such as reducing the subject content; using visual aids in teaching ; teaching through experiments; students using various study techniques; making biology teaching interesting and effective; and, teaching biology by connecting the topics with daily life. Interestingly, a majority of responses (99) highlighted 'the nature of topic' as one of the primary reasons for making biology learning difficult; however, the suggestions to enhance learning were predominantly related to either 'students' own learning habits' (148) or 'teachers' teaching style' (127). The study provides an insight into 'students' voices' not only in identifying the 'difficult areas in Biology' but highlighting perspectives in explaining the 'reasons for difficulties in learning these concepts' and potential strategies to improve learning. The results could be useful for practitioners and policy-makers in enhancing curriculum and classroom practices to make this fundamentally important subject interesting for students. The tool adapted for the study is a valuable addition to the indigenous literature which can be used by the other researchers in the field to conduct large scale studies.