والدہ ،مولانا سعیداحمد اکبرآبادی
قارئین برہان کویہ معلوم ہوکرصدمہ ہوگا کہ ۲۴؍نومبر کو برادر عزیز مولانا سعیداحمد ایم۔ اے کی والدۂ ماجدہ کاسانحۂ ارتحال پیش آگیا،بڑھاپے کے باوجود ابھی ایسے آثار نہیں پائے جاتے تھے کہ مرحومہ اس قدر جلد پیام اجل کو لبیک کہنے والی ہیں۔ ۱۹؍ نومبر(جمعہ) کی صبح تک بالکل تندرست تھیں۔معمول کے مطابق اپنے اکلوتے بیٹے کے کمرے میں ریڈیو پر کلام پاک سننے کے لیے تشریف لائیں۔قرآن مجید کے بعد نعت سنی، نعت شریف کے بعد مزامیر کے ساتھ سلام شروع ہواتو اسی وقت اٹھ کر اندر چلی گئیں ،بیٹا پکارتا رہا بوا! یہ بھی تو نعت ہی ہے اسے بھی سنتی جاؤ۔بولیں نہیں میاں اس کے ساتھ باجاہے۔ بس یہ آخری گفتگو تھی جو ماں بیٹے میں ہوئی، مولانا سعید احمد کالج چلے گئے۔مشکل سے چند منٹ ہوئے ہوں گے کہ مرحومہ کے جسم کے بائیں حصہ پرفالج کا نہایت خوفناک حملہ ہوا۔اسی وقت بے ہوشی طاری ہوگئی ،مکمل بے ہوشی کی یہ کیفیت آخر وقت تک قائم رہی ،یہاں تک کہ چھٹے روز ۲۴؍ نومبر (چہارشنبہ) کی صبح کوتقریباً ۴ بجے روح جسمِ خاکی سے پرواز کرگئی۔ اناﷲ وانا الیہ راجعون ۔
ان پانچ دنوں میں معالجہ کی بہتر سے بہتر تدبیریں کی گئیں لیکن ساعتِ معین آپہنچی تھی کوئی علاج کامیاب نہیں ہوا اوربالآخر ’’بوا‘‘ ہم سب سے ہمیشہ کے لیے جدا ہوگئیں۔
’’بوا‘‘ آج دنیا میں نہیں ہیں لیکن ان کے اوصاف ان کے چھوٹوں کوہمیشہ یاد رہیں گے، وہ اول درجہ کی کریم النفس، بااخلاق مرنجان و مرنج خاتون تھیں، عابدہ، معتکفہ، زہدواتقاکاپیکر، خاشعات، متصدقات، صائمات، حافظات، ذاکرات کی پہلی صف میں بیٹھنے والیں، جودوسخا اورشفقت ومودت کابے مثل نمونہ، اکلوتے بیٹے کی شادی اس وقت تک نہیں کی جب تک اپنے ساتھ لے جا کراس کوحج نہیں کرالیا،بیٹا ہونے پرمنت بھی مانی تو کیسی انوکھی۔...
This research article is based upon critical analysis of D.S Margoliouth’s indictment regarding pious lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra”. Generally Orientalists have tried to affect the image of the Prophet Muḥammad (s.a.w) and prevailed uncertainties. It affects a large number of Muslim Scholars, intellectuals and youngsters because Orientals’ are well aware that Muslims cannot be defeated in battle-fields unless they are defeated in the field of faith and ideology. Our aim is to protect less aware Muslims, intellectuals and youngsters form the pseudo and grimy views of the Orientalists. Like other prejudice Orientalists D.S. Margoliouth have also indictments regarding lineage (Nasb e Muṭahharra) in his book “Muḥammad and The Rise of Islam”. Margoliouth argue with texts of Qur’ān and Ḥadith, without having any relation with the passage, to identify the essence of his ill well, hatred and prejudice with in the eyes of Muslims and common readers at large. This article concern five allegations of D.S. Margoliouth on the lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra” and concludes that he failed to maintain his objectivity in the description of lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra”.
Biochemical changes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and healthy pregnant women (HPW) were studied. 103 GDM women and 97 HPW were selected and registered for the study from the admitted pregnant women of Gynea Ward of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. Sociodemographic and other pregnancy related information, including monthly-income, age, body mass index (BMI), parity, previous history of gestational diabetes and family history of diabetes, were collected on a well-designed questionnaire. Fasting blood sugar (FBS), random blood sugar (RBS), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (PC), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), liver function tests namely alanine amino transferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum bilirubin, renal function tests namely urea, creatinine, and hormones like insulin, prolactin, cortisol, triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxin (T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were determined by standard procedures using recommended kit for each procedure. The data were statistically analyzed using computer software, SPSS version 10. The mean monthly income of GDM and HPW was Rs.30845 ± 11107 vs Rs.28360 ± 11511, mean age was 34.01 ± 4.54 years vs 30.30 ± 5.86 years, mean BMI was 28.07 ± 2.90 kg/m 2 vs 27.30 ± 1.94 kg/ m 2 , mean parity was 5.44 ± 2.49 vs 4.95 ± 2.43, mean systolic BP was 114.80 ± 17.14 mm Hg vs 107.70 ± 19.40 mm Hg and mean diastolic BP was 86.50 ± 7.48 mm Hg vs 80.70 ± 10.02 mm Hg respectively. Age, BMI, systolic and diastolic BP was significantly higher (P<0.05) according to Pearson Chi- square test in GDM women as vicompared to HPW. The mean FBS, RBS and HbA1c of GDM women and HPW were 111.69 ± 8.70 mg/dL vs 86.59 ± 6.91, 145.45 ± 6.62 mg/dL vs 123.52 ± 9.37mg/dL and 6.58 ± 1.30 vs 4.95 ± 0.45 respectively. The FBS, RBS and HbA1c of GDM women were significantly higher than the HPW (P<0.001). The mean Hb concentration and PC of GDM women and HPW were 10.98 ± 1.12% vs 11.01 ± 1.03% and 226.31 thousand/mL vs 228.14 ± 37.61 thousand/mL. In lipid profile TC and TG of GDM group were significantly higher than the contol group (P<0.01). The mean TC of GDM and HPW was 206.01 ± 18.79 mg/dL vs 195.01 ± 24.15 mg/dL, TG was 190.12 ± 19.83 mg/dL vs 172.13 ± 21.66 mg/dL, HDL-C was 55.21 ± 8.20 mg/dL vs 56.20 ± 8.82 mg/dL and LDL-C was 93.13 ± 18.71 mg/dL vs 88.10 ± 16.36 mg/dL respectively. Liver and renal function tests of GDM women were not significantly different (P<0.05) from HPW. In liver function tests the mean ALT, ALP and serum bilirubin values of GDM women were 30.21 ± 12.47 U/L, 190.55 ± 22.20 U/L, 0.67 ± 0.41 mg/dL while of HPW were 29.64 ± 7.96 U/L, 189.95 ± 21.28 U/L, 0.58 ± 0.17 mg/dL respectively. In renal function tests the mean serum urea and serum creatinine values of GDM women were 23.70 ± 8.54 mg/dL and 0.82 ± 0.32 mg/dL while of HPW were 21.97 ± 6.16 mg/dL and 0.74 ± 0.15 mg/dL respectively. The mean insulin level of GDM women were 33.68 ± 3.69 μIU/mL, which was significantly higher (P<0.01) than the mean insulin level of HPW (29.80 ± 2.80 μIU/mL ). Among placental hormones the mean prolactin values of GDM women and HPW were 135.47 ± 9.83 ng/mL vs 131.80 ± 8.54 ng/mL and mean serum cortisol values were 734.9 ± 51.1 ng/mL vs 719.2 ± 54.7 ng/mL. The mean serum prolactin and serum cortisol values of GDM women were significantly higher (P< 0.05) when compared to HPW. No significant differences were viiobserved in the concentration of thyroid hormones. The mean TSH values of GDM and HPW were 1.72 ± 0.95 mlU/L vs 1.87 ± 0.83 mlU/L, mean T 3 values were 2.51 ± 0.62 nmol/L vs 2.62 ± 0.57 nmol/L, mean T 4 values were 103. 86 ± 14.74 nmol/L vs 105.38 ± 13.93 nmol/L. Cesarean sections (P=0.009), still birth rate (P=0.003) and macrosomic babies (P=0.001) were significantly more in GDM group.