انمول قائد
بس تو کتنا انمول ہے ……بھٹو صاحب نے ڈی ایس پی راولپنڈی کی طرف دیکھا اور پوچھا ’’میرا نا م کیا ہے ‘‘ڈی سی نے جواب دیا ’’سر آپ ذوالفقار علی بھٹو ہیں ‘‘اور بھٹو صاحب نے پوچھا میرے والد کا کیا نام تھا ۔ڈی سی نے جواب دیا ’’سر ان کا نام سر شاہ نواز بھٹو تھا ‘‘اور بھٹو نے کہا قابض جنرل کا کیا نام ہے ۔ڈی ایس پی نے جواب دیا ’’جنرل ضیاء الحق ‘‘بھٹو صاحب بولے ’’تو اب اس قابض جنرل کے والدکا نام بتا ئو ‘‘ڈی ایس پی نے ادب سے عرض کیا ’’سر میں نہیں جانتا ‘‘بھٹو صاحب بولے ’’اور تم یہ چاہتے ہو کہ سر شاہ نواز بھٹو کا بیٹا ذوالفقار علی بھٹو کسی نامعلوم مولوی حق کے قابض بیٹے جنرل ضیاء الحق سے بھیک مانگے ۔
سلیوٹ فار فائونڈر آف اٹامک پاکستان
سیلوٹ فار فائونڈر آف مسلم نیشنز یونیٹی
سیلوٹ فار فائونڈر آف اسلامک ورلڈ بنک
سیلوٹ فار بھٹو
A review and comparative analysis of the intellectual pursuit, methods, approaches and publications of Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim In his compilations of hadith, Imam Bukhari was considerate of the view point (or school of thought) of his prior narrators/authors of hadith collections and in doing so, he validated and embellished their (past narrators) publications. Similarly, narrators after Imam Bukhari benefited from his intellectual vigour, as evident in the work of Imam Muslim, who as Imam Bukhari’s student profited from his work, and compiled a treasure of validated hadiths. This body of work had deep influence on the contemporary and upcoming authors and collectors of hadith, as a source of religious knowledge. Since, Imam Muslim didn’t/couldn’t perform the compilation/ Codification / arrangement of his collected hadith, which was later on performed by Imam Novi, who was intellectually and academically influenced by the Imam Bukhari’s publications – hence, a great deal of semblance is evident in both the authors (Imam Bukhari and Muslim) publications. This is especially visible in certain aspects such as prescribing translation chapters (tarjumatul-baab) with the Quranic verses and hadith scripts. Similarly, Codification chapters for explanatory (questioning) notions is also common method practiced in both the author’s work. However, on the other hand, the publication of both the author’s differ in certain dimensions as well. For example, Imam Bukhari’s publications incorporates a complexity of thought, legalistic determination (Fiqh) and collective scholarly wisdom (ijtihad). Whereas, Imam Muslim’s work pursues a relatively simplistic and comprehensible format. In this article, we seek to review and present a comparative analysis of the intellectual pursuit, approach and publications of both the aforementioned authors.
The work compiled in the present dissertation consists of two parts, ‘‘Studies on secondary metabolites from Syzygium aromaticum Linn.’’ has been describe in part A, while part B describes the ‘‘Chemical modification of some bioactive indole alkaloids.’’ A review of the biosynthesis of triterpenoids (α-amyrin and β-amyrin) and phenyl propanoid (eugenol) is also included.