تعقبات ابن العراقي واستدراكاته في تحفة التحصيل على العلائي في جامع التحصيل

The research reveals significant insights cited by Ibn Al ‘Irāqī in his book "Toḥfah Al Taḥṣīl" on the illusions of Al-‘Alā'ī in his book "Jāmi Al Taḥṣīl". It highlights the scientific value of those illusions that Ibn Al-‘Irāqī pointed out. Several of them are related to narrators of hadith and their issues of hearing from their sheikhs. Many of those illusions are related to the chain narrators (isnad), the main text of the report (matn), or their position in the books of sunnah. There are no previous studies on this subject. I put the sequential insights I revel under headlines through which one can realize the illusions that Al-Ala'i fell in. I conclude with the perceptions that both Ibn Al-‘Iraqī and Al-‘Alā’ī have shared. I don’t mention my opinion after each insight for Ibn Al-‘Iraqī; however, my silence is an approval to what he said. When I went against him or it was important to mention any comment or information, I openly said my opinion and explained the reasons for my opposition. Some of the research findings are: Al-Ala'i ignores mentioning the narrator's gap (irsal), although Al-Mizzī mentions it in his book "Tahdhīb", or the scholars mention it before both of them.  He describes the narrator having a gap (irsāl) and attributes it to Al-Mizzī.  He added notes like "he didn't encounter him" and formulated expressions that weren’t mentioned by neither Al Dhahabī nor Al-Mizzī. He references a Ḥadīth to a book that it is not included in.

Weed Management Studies in Sugarcane Saccharum Officinarum L. .

Impact of planting techniques, weed-crop competition periods, and weed control methods on yield potential of spring planted sugarcane variety HSF-240 was studied at Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. The study was comprised of two experiments laid out in RCBD with a split-plot arrangement, quad replicated, with net plot size of 3.6m x 10m. In both experiments, two planting techniques viz. 60 cm apart rows in flat sowing technique and 120 cm apart rows in trench sowing technique were randomized in main plot. In first experiment seven weed-crop competition periods viz. throughout full season weed free, weed-crop competition for 45 days after sowing (DAS), 60 DAS, 75 DAS, 90 DAS, 105 DAS, and full season weed-crop competition were kept in sub plots. In second experiment, eight weed control methods viz. ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 750 g a.i. ha -1 , ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 750 g a.i. ha -1 + 4% urea, ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 562 g a.i. ha -1 + 4% urea, manual hoeing, ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 750 g a.i. ha -1 + mechanical weed control, ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 375 g a.i. ha -1 + sorghum & sunflower water extract each @ 15 L ha -1 and ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 187.5 g a.i. ha -1 + sorghum & sunflower water extract each @ 15 L ha -1 were randomized in subplots. Results revealed that on two years average, trench sowing by yielding 73.65 t ha -1 stripped cane yield, significantly superseded the flat sowing which gave 65.08 t ha -1 stripped cane yield. On the average of two years, zero competition (weed free throughout the season) recorded 92.21 t ha -1 stripped cane yield, significantly higher than any weed- crop competition period. However, weed-crop competition for 45, 60, 75, 90, and 105 DAS gave 104.26, 85.22, 75.40, 42.63, and 40.17 % stripped cane yield, respectively over weedy check. In second experiment, trench sowing gave significantly higher stripped cane yield of 76.20 t ha -1 than 71.40 t ha -1 in flat sowing technique. In weed control methods, ametryn + trifloxysulfuron @ 750 g a.i. ha -1 + mechanical weed control gave significantly higher stripped cane yield of 101.68 t ha -1 than all weed control methods as well as weedy check which gave 37.28 t ha -1 . Different weed control methods gave 18.03 to 179.29 % higher stripped cane yields over weedy check.