ﷺ
تضمین بر مشہورِ زمانہ نعت بہ قلمِ نصیر احمد اخترؔ
دمِ عیسیٰؑ نہیں دیکھا ! یدِ بیضا نہیں دیکھا !
جہاں میں چشمِ جبرائیلؑ نے کیا کیا نہیں دیکھا
جمالِ ماہِ کنعاؑں کا حسیں جلوہ نہیں دیکھا! !
جہاں دیدہ نگا ہوں نے بہت ڈھونڈا نہیں دیکھا
زمانے میں محمد مصطفیٰؐ جیسا نہیں دیکھا
ستاروں کی ضیاؤں سے زمینِ ثور کہتی ہے
قمر کی دلکشی پر خوب کر کے غور ، کہتی ہے
فلک پرکہکشاں پھر پھیل کر ہر طور کہتی ہے
نگاہِ آسماںؐ لیتی ہے بوسے اور کہتی ہے
بہت دیکھے ہیں لیکن اُنؐ سا نقشِ پا نہیں دیکھاا
فلک کی عظمتیں قربان اس کے ذرّے ذرّے پر
قطار اندر قطار آتے ہیں قدسی آستانے پر
فدا ہے رفعتِ سدرہ اسی پرنور خطّے پر
فرشتے سر نگوں پائے گئے آقاؐ کے روضے پر
رسولوں میں بھی کوئی اُنؐ کا ہم پایہ نہیں دیکھا
کوئی عنصر نہیں دوئی کا اس منظر سہانے میں
کرن سورج کی ہے ناکام اس کی مثل لانے میں
زمیں پر چلنے پھرنے میں’ دنیٰ ‘‘تک آنے جانے میں
مُسلم آپؐ کی یکتائی ہے سارے زمانے میں
کہیں چشمِ فلک نے آپؐ کا سایہ نہیں دیکھا
ﷺ
تضمین بر مشہورِ زمانہ نعت بہ قلمِ نصیر احمد اخترؔ
دمِ عیسیٰؑ نہیں دیکھا ! یدِ بیضا نہیں دیکھا !
جہاں میں چشمِ جبرائیلؑ نے کیا کیا نہیں دیکھا
جمالِ ماہِ کنعاؑں کا حسیں جلوہ نہیں دیکھا! !
جہاں دیدہ نگا ہوں نے بہت ڈھونڈا نہیں دیکھا
زمانے میں محمد مصطفیٰؐ جیسا نہیں دیکھا
ستاروں کی ضیاؤں سے زمینِ ثور کہتی ہے
قمر کی دلکشی پر خوب کر کے غور ، کہتی ہے
فلک پرکہکشاں پھر پھیل کر ہر طور کہتی ہے
نگاہِ آسماںؐ...
Since Eschatological Sciences are playing a vital role in shaping theologoy and philosophy of the major world religions. The concept of Hell is conceived as a place where human actions are judged and then rewarded accordingly on the Day of Judgment. Aim of the paper is to find out how the terminlolgy of Hell and its concept is evolved in several versions of the English Bibles of the twenthith century. The paper highlighted that due to numerous English translations of the Bible in ninthenth and twentheith century, not only caused amalgamation in supplementary concepts but also caused change in the concept of Hell as well. This resulted confusion in other eschatological dogmas evolved around the subject. Keeping in view its evolved concept over the history the research shows how it affected other related concepts to it.
Studies were carried out to evaluate the seasonal incidence of population of Helicoverpa armigera, Chrysoperla carnea and parasitism of H. armigera by Habrobracon hebetor in three districts, i.e. Faisalabad, Multan and Rahim Yaar Khan, temperature dependent biological parameters, drought influence on H. armigera along its natural enemies [C. carnea (Stephens) and H. hebetor (Say)] and development of IPM module against H. armigera in cotton agro-ecosystem. The maximum population of adults and larvae of H. armigera recorded during the month of August was 4.10 per trap and 0.52 per plant, respectively. The lowest population was recorded in October, with values of 0.87 adults per trap and 0.12 larvae per plant. Population of C. carnea was highest (0.90 per plant) in September and the lowest number (0.21 per plant) was recorded in July. Similarly, parasitism rates were highest (33.7%) and lowest (04.87%) in September and July, respectively. Adults and larvae of H. armigera were highest in R.Y. Khan i.e. 3.48 and 0.44 per plant, respectively. In contrast, C. carnea population was highest (0.72 per plant) in Faisalabad which was followed by Multan (0.55 per plant) and R.Y. Khan (0.38 per plant). Parasitism was also high in the district Faisalabad (13.39%) followed by Multan (6.36%) and R. Y. Khan (6.23%). Adults and larvae were positively correlated with temperature and r values were calculated at 0.5818 and 0.5240, respectively. Population of C. carnea was negatively correlated with temperature with an r value of -0.5546. Similarly, the parasitism of H. armigera by H. hebetor was negatively correlated with temperature (r= -0.5768). Higher temperatures decreased the duration of development and also decreased the reproductive capacity of H. armigera, C. carnea and H. hebetor. Degree days for developmental period for H. armigera, C. carnea and H. hebetor were 250, 166.67 and 71.43, respectively. The drought caused significant detrimental effects on population of H. armigera and parasitism by H. hebetor. In contrast, C. carnea population was not significantly (F= 2.01, DF= 4 and P>0.05) affected by drought. The maximum yield was recorded 1639.52 kg/ha (16.0 kg/plot) in T15 [T1 (spray of Spinosad) + T2 (spray of neem seed kernel extract) + T3 (release of C. carnea) + T4 (release of H. hebetor)] which was followed by T12 [T1 (spray of Spinosad) + T2 (spray of neem seed kernel extract) + T4 (releases of H. hebetor)] and T13 [T1 (spray of Spinosad) + T3 (release of C. carnea) + T4 (release of H. hebeor)] with values of 1475.568 and 1332.11 kg/ha, respectively. T1 (spray of Spinosad), T5 [(spray of Spinosad) + (spray of neem seed kernel extract)] and T15 proved the most economical pest management modules exhibiting CBR 1:6 followed by T7 [(sprays of Spinosad) + (releases of H. hebetor)] and T12 [(spray of Spinosad) + (spray of neem seed kernel extract) + (releases of H. hebetor)] which explained a CBR of 1:5.5 approximately.